2020 US Presidential Race


#626

Good morning Dominion…

You ready to get your ass handed to you?

Unroll available on Thread Reader

Image

We have quite a bit to work with overnight…

No honor amongst thieves…

You have something to say I suggest you say it now. You will be exposed and we will hunt every last one… Image

Care to explain why you are blacklisted and show up on the Threat Intel sites 75+ times :man_shrugging:t4: Image

Ahhhhh, that explains it…

Makes me feel so much better you are all over the Dark Web… Image

That’s cool can you make sure that Cloudfare only blocks the transmission of @realDonaldTrump votes? K thanks Image

Making more and more sense…

Honeypot for who though? Image

Hi :raising_hand_man:t4: Image

That’s cool because those httpd’s are secure right? Image

I have captured quite a bit the last couple of days. Shoot me what you got and I will do the same :raised_hands:t4:

Unroll available on Thread Reader

Porn sites like this one :sweat_smile:

Wow these people are comp’d af…

I haven’t really even dug in yet but it is a joke how bad it is… Image

:face_with_monocle: Image

Occasional travel “both” domestic…

:face_with_monocle: Image

What a tangled web we weave… Image

Everyone…

Let’s look at the election security laws/guidance by state…

GA blaming the “glitch” on a software update is their biggest mistake as the machines are not supposed to be connected…

We know they are and they admitted it… Image

• • •

Unroll Src: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325129915709104129.html


#627


#628

Checks out.


Archived link: https://archive.is/EF0P9


#629

Could be an interesting 74 days…


#630

“Dems Committed Election Treason” – Alex Newman

Greg Hunter

256K subscribers

Journalist Alex Newman says this 2020 election fraud is the biggest in the history of the free world. Newman explains, “This is on a whole other level. They are not just trying to steal our money, they are trying to steal our country, our future, our liberties and our constitutional system of government. That is, by definition, treason. It is waging war against the United States. The fact that no charges are being filed and no investigations going on it tells you everything you need to know about AG Barr, the DOJ and the FBI. . . . There is a coup underway right now, a coup d’état. . . .Their goal is a complete overthrow of the United States of America.” Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with journalist Alex Newman, who writes for many outlets such as The New American, The Epoch Times and his own site Liberty Sentinel.org.

Four Seasons Landscaping Presser


#631

For those of you that might have tuned in and did not see Fox
News’ “Justice” with Judge Jeanine Pirro on Saturday night, sources told Newsmax the show was suspended over a spat on the network’s coverage of President Donald Trump.

Sources close to the network tell Newsmax, because she made a very staunch defense of President Trump and wanted to expose the vote fraud that took place in the election, Fox News decided not to air her show. It had extended coverage of Democrat Joe Biden’s acceptance speech of a contested election…


#632

‘THE FIX IS IN’: Gingrich and Trump set MEDIA’s collusion on Biden narrative on FIRE

“The media pack has declared Biden won,” Newt Gingrich said on Twitter, Saturday. That’s a fact. Just before Giuliani was set to give a presser exposing even more evidence of problems and discuss real legal challenges brought by the Trump team in court, the media in mass did a narrative coup, to steal his thunder and declare Joe the winner.

Gingrich and President Trump lit into it on Sunday morning. It’s not over, despite the fix being in, and when you hear it laid out it’s crazy they have declared this thing over. First, here’s Newt from yesterday

Newt Gingrich @newtgingrich

If you want to see how much the fix is in, votes are still being counted, no recounts have started, challenges are ignored, 5 states are within one per cent but the media pack has declared Biden won.

4:52 PM · Nov 7, 2020·Twitter for iPad

Src: https://twitter.com/newtgingrich/status/1325118923491082242


#633

The levels of content removal at the moment is beyond the beyond across multiple platforms. Think the usual suspects.

It appears some of the main MSM have removed their live election night coverage videos from youtube, to disappear ambiguous or not live shennigians or required as evidence in court, who knows but some videos from the alphabet msm appear to be no longer available.

Trump -19958, Biden +19958

Video here:


#634

The Healing continues…

Dinesh D’Souza @DineshDSouza

What exactly do you mean by “destroyed thoroughly”? Discredited? Murdered? Sent to a gas chamber? “His kind” is the type of language the Nazis used

@davidplouffe

Image

3:41 PM · Nov 7, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

Src: https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/1325101173486088193

“Held responsible”

Dana Loesch @DLoesch

Held responsible now?

Image

1:32 AM · Nov 7, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

Src: https://twitter.com/DLoesch/status/1324887367656861702


#635

The levels of shite spewed on the pin recently is beyond the beyond. It’s a shame to see this place descend into a hole for conspiracy theory bullshit :slightly_frowning_face:


#636

Well said! :+1:


#637

Great, you get the message :+1:


#638

Russian President Vladimir Putin is refusing to congratulate Joe Bidenupon his election to president-elect on Saturday, because there are still “legal processes” to go through.

Russia would only recognise a new president on confirmation of “official results,” his spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday, without elaborating on what exactly that would mean.

“We believe the correct thing to do is wait,” he told journalists. “President Putin has on many occasions said he would respect any choice the American nation makes.”


#639

Does this mean the Russians are refusing to interfere in the American election?


#640

Yes, All Opinions Matter (as long as they are the right ones), but don’t have too much too think. :policeman:


#641

You know that the World is totally fucked when a comment from Putin gives you a little hope.


#642

I can’t make sense of that sentence … “but that’s ok” :smiley:


#643

Interesting claims - how long will this twitter account last?

V_C_435

16h, 10 tweets, 5 min read

Pennsylvania data shows that some of the mail in ballots were returned BEFORE they were mailed, on the same day or next day. I marked such ballots as “Suspicious” (RED) in the plot. There are 109421 (3.53%) “Suspicious” ballots. @DatElefan @Peoples_Pundit @shylockhImageImage

Data is taken from here: data.pa.gov/Government-Eff…

If only look at those “suspicious” mail-in ballot - most of them come from PHILADELPHIA and LEHIGH - around 44% ImageImage

Now let’s look at Mail Application Type. OLMAILV-This is a mail ballot application that was submitted online. MAILIN-This is a mail-in ballot application. “Suspicious” ballots have higher ratio of Mail-In compared to Online than normal ballots. ImageImage

You would expect that under normal circumstances (and if there is a perfectly legal explanation for “suspicious ballots”) the turnaround time should not depend on how the ballot was requested? Also, table above is colored by %age for “% of Total(Y)” - Y for “suspicious”

Actually, if we look at distribution of mail-in vs online requests, you can see that anomaly starts for ballots that were received whole FIVE days after they were sent. This increases number of “suspicious” ballots. Image

Another anomaly. There is a group of around ~1000 ballots that stands out. I called them “Fast” ballots. Suddenly a group of ballots started arriving much faster than before. They are highlighted in the plot. Image

This is mostly due to: CVO - absentee ballot application for an overseas civilian voter. F - absentee application for an individual who qualifies to vote for federal offices in federal election years. M - absentee ballot application for a military voter. Image

It seems strange that military and oversees ballots suddenly started arriving THREE days faster than general population. Median turnaround for normal ballots (excluding “suspicious”) is 14 days, for “fast” it is 11 days. Means are 16.3 and 12.96 days respectively.

One more observation. This time I overlaid initial plot with data density plot. You can see that the main injection of the suspicious ballots was around 10/26-10/27 (Mon-Tue) for Mailed Date and it was mostly the same day ballots. I estimate around 43k ballots in that group. Image

Unroll Src: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325538470593400832.html

Twit Src: Src: https://twitter.com/VC4351/status/1325538470593400832


#644

25,816 views

CulturalHusbandry Profile picture

CulturalHusbandry 12h, 39 tweets, 10 min read

The following information is provided via an anonymous data scientist and another anonymous individual who wrote a script to scrape the national ballot counting time series data of off the @nytimes website.

This is based on their proprietary “Edison” data source which would ordinarily be impossible to access for people outside the press.

The CSV is available here:
s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id145669…
And the script to generate it is here:

Pastebin.com - Potentially offensive content ahead! Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.https://pastebin.com/NkYXrJEX

I suggest that everyone back up both of these files, bc this is an extremely important data source, and we cant risk anyone taking it down.

What we are looking at will be time series analysis and you will see that it is extremely difficult to create convincing synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.

One of the first things noticed while exploring the dataset is that there seems to be an obvious pattern in the ratio of new #Biden ballots to new #Trump ballots. Image

As we can see on this log-log plot, for many of the counting progress updates, we see an almost constant ratio of #Biden to #Trump. It’s such a regular pattern that we can actually fit a linear regression model to it with near-perfect accuracy, barring some outliers.

How could this be possible? Is this a telltale sign of fraud? Surprisingly, as it will be shown, the answer is no! This is actually expected behavior. Also, we can use this weird pattern in the ballot counting to spot fraud!

Here is the same pattern for Florida. We see this linear pattern again. Image

and again
Image

and again
Image

and again all over the country. What appears to be happening is that points on the straight line are actually mail in votes. The reason they’re so homogeneous across with respect to the ratio of #Biden vs #Trump votes is that they get randomly shuffled in the mail… Image

like a deck of cards. Since the ballots are randomly mixed together during transport, spanning areas occupied by multiple voting demographics, we can expect the ratio of mail-in #Biden ballots to mail-in #Trump ballots will remain relatively constant over time…

and across different reporting updates.

Lets dig a little deeper into this:

Here is a plot of the same Florida voting data, but this time it’s the ratio of #Bidento #Trump ballots, versus time. What we see is that the initial ballot reportings are very noisy and “random”. Image

The initial reporting represents in-person voting. These vote reports have such large variation bc in-person voting happens across different geographic areas that have different political alignments.

We can see this same pattern of noisy in-person voting, followed by homogeneous mail-in reporting in almost all cases.

What we see in almost all examples across the country is that the ratio of mail-in Dem to Rep ballots is very consistent across time, but with the notable drift from Dem to slightly more Rep. Image

This slight drift from D to R mail-ins occurs again and again, and is likely due to outlying rural areas having more R votes. These outlying areas take longer to ship their ballots to the polling centers.

Now we’re getting into the really good stuff. When we see mail-in ballot counting where there isn’t relatively stable ratios of D and R ballots that slightly drift R, we have an anomaly! Anomalies themselves are not necessarily fraud, but they can help us spot fraud more easily.

Now let’s look at some anomalies:

This is the Wisconsin vote counting history log. Again, on the Y axis we have the ratio of D to R ballots in reporting batch, and on the X axis we have reporting time. Image

Around 4am there, there is a marked shift in the ratio of D to R mail-in ballots. Based on other posts in this thread, this should not happen. This is an anomaly, and while anomalies are not always fraud, often they may point to fraud.

so what happened just before 3am CST in Wisconsin? This did!

Around 3am Wisconsin time, a fresh batch of 169k new absentee ballots arrived. They were supposed to stop accepting new ballots, but eh, whatever I guess.

By 4am the D to R ratio was all thrown out of whack. That is because these ballots were not sampled from the real Wisconsin voter population, and they were not randomized in the mail sorting system with the other ballots. They inherently have a different D to R signature…

than the rest of the ballots quite possibly bc additional ballots were added to the batch, either through backdating or ballot manufacturing or software tampering. This of this being kind of analogous to carbon-14 dating, but for ballot batch authenticity.

lets look at another anomaly: Image

Here is Pennsylvania’s vote counting history. For the first part of the vote counting process, we see the same pattern for mail-in ballots that we’ve seen in every other state in the country, which is relatively stable D to R ratio that gradually drifts R as more ballots…

come in from rural outlying areas.

But then as counting continues, the D to R ratio in mail-in ballots inexplicably begin “increasing”. Again, this should not happen, and it is observed almost nowhere else in the country, because all of the ballots are randomly shuffled…

in the mail system and should be homogeneous during counting. The only exceptions to this are other suspect states that also have anomalies.
Again, this is evidence of ballot backdating, manufacturing of software tampering.

Lets look at another anomaly: Image

In Georgia we see pretty much the same story as Pennsylvania: increasing fractions of mail-in D ballots over time even though it defies logic and we see this pattern no where else in the country.

In Michigan, we see a combination of Wisconsin strangeness, together with the GA/PA weirdness. We see both signs of contaminated ballot dumping, and ballot ratios drifting toward dems when they should not be. Image

Virginia:
Image

Now in fairness, VA is the only state out of the 50 that has anomalies but has not had accusations of voter fraud, yet. I think this is the exception that proves the rule. Yet to figure out what causes this anomalous shift, but here it is so no one accuses me of holding it back.

Lets wrap this up: It appears Dems shot themselves in the foot bc making everyone do mail-in ballots actually makes it easier to catch mail-in ballot fraud. Bc all of the ballots go through the postal system, they get shuffled like a deck of cards, so we expect reported…

ballot return to be extremely UNIFORM in terms of D vs R ratio, but to drift slightly towards R over time bc some of those ballots travel farther. This pattern proves fraud and is a verifiable timestamp of when each fraudulent action occurred.

Please disseminate as necessary. Good luck. Stay safe. Be kind to your neighbors.


Unroll Src: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325592112428163072.html

Src: https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325592112428163072


#645

Agreed, it’s really put a taint on this place for me.

Twitter is a real problem in promoting all this. A lot of the fake election fraud material emanated from there. By the time the misinformation was fact checked and/or debunked, there were another bunch of new lies already taking its place. It was too late of course by then. You already had people out protesting at count centres and waffling on the media about how the election was stolen.

For all the talk about the election being stolen, the numbers really don’t support that. You only need to look at Pennsylvania, which supposed was at the centre of the worst of the fraud to see that the numbers don’t stack up. The state voted well within the national trend of a 2% swing to Biden (it went from +0.7% Trump to +0.7% Biden). While the election was fairly tight, it’s clear Biden won and any notion of recounts or appeals is as big a waste of a time now, as it would have been for Clinton in 2016.

I think overall, the Republicans will be happy enough. They expected to lose, but still came close to winning, they will control the Senate, they have already seen AOC and her “squad” call the truce off within the Democrat party to push for socialism. If they play their cards right and don’t run an imbecile in 2024, I’d be fairly confident they should win back the presidency.