Both were 2.25m, then 2.3m
property-vultures.com/History/413306.html
property-vultures.com/History/412923.html
Each now 1.975m
daft.ie/searchsale.daft?id=413306
daft.ie/searchsale.daft?id=412923
#31 daft.ie/searchsale.daft?id=413306 now back up to 2.3m
#33 daft.ie/searchsale.daft?id=412923 now back up to 2.25m
Global depression, what global depression?
Maybe they meant to drop to 230k and 225k respectively, but made a mistake on the decimal place 
That’s a 1.6% gross yield on 2.25m 
If you assume a 6% gross yield is more sustainable, say as an investment, that rent would value the property at… 600k 
Both these properties are examples of false advertsiing. They are 4 bedroom houses with a converted attic which cannot legally be described as a bedroom.
you sure about the false advertising bit, Howitzer - thought that if they were converted to a specific level of completion (e.g. all the fire proofing regulations etc.), then they could be called bedrooms?
anyhooo, fail to understand the correlation between the suggested sales price and the rental figure … multiplication and/or yields mustn’t be on the curriculum in D6!
The floor plan describes the converted attic as an attic room and the pictures show no bed. Also no fire escape is shown. Good enough for me.
fair enough… i’ll get me coat 