Apple, Ireland, EU, Tax Avoidance, Margrethe Vestager, CCCTB … 20532.html

She’s definitely one of the worst.
Sweary Mary (Coughlan) might have been even worse?
And for pure negative impact (i.e. negative results, not just potential), Brian Lenihan is way up there.

But MMOC is very very limited, and I’d imagine is targeted by various corporate affairs outfits on that basis.

As bad as she is, she has sat at the Cabinet table and heard all of the Noonan / DOF / AG discussion on Apple. She also got a copy of the 130 page EU ruling. And this is what she writes. Shows how mis-led / badly informed even the Irish Cabinet are.

More from the always interesting site (if his site was easier to read and less cluttered, it would be the even more useful; some very good analysis and data on it re Ireland, that you don’t get in other media)

FINFACTS: Irish Venture Capital in 2016 - More Leprachaun Economics

As with Noonan’s dodgy deal on Apple blowing our 2015 GDP up by 26%, in return for taking on up to €380m in extra annual EU GDP levies, I wonder if all of these smaller deals are paying their EU GDP levy cost of 0.25%?

i.e. If a €100m in equity deal, is “housed” in Ireland, that is c €250,000 p.a. extra in EU GDP levies for Ireland. It would be pretty stupid if the deal was paying c €100,000 p.a. in Irish advisor fees for their Irish tax avoidance post-box (on Sir John Rogerson’s Quay), and the State was still paying more in EU levies?

There used to be an Irish Department of Finance argument (doctrine), that artificially boosting Irish GDP (even if we loose all dirct economic benefit from paying extra EU GDP levies), is still worth it as it reduces Irish borrowing costs. However, with Irish Bond yields largely divorced from Irish fundamentals (solely driven by ECB activity)m AND almost at 0% anyway, this arguement would no longer appear to hold up. I wonder if the DOF watch this?

Heres a revelation.
I had a family member was a member of FG many moons ago.
Hes not too bright - was more of the table-thumping type than anything - but he was a paid up member and a reliable ‘believer’ (in as far as he understood what was going on).

What shocked the family was that he was asked to stand in a few no-hoper SCD constituencys in the early 90s.
(edit - he was aware of this but was promised a ‘good’ constituency as if he sucked a few lemons first…)
The family were shocked because he was obviously running a deficit in the ‘understanding the debate department’.
Nonetheless he was pursued until family members persuaded him otherwise.
The conclusion was that FG ‘pick their men well’.
Hayes would be another one that falls into that category - and another I have experience of - a complete moron, but blindly loyal and can throw shapes convincingly.

On a completely unrelated note a farming family from Meath might be far, far brighter (and much, much more arrogant) than you might imagine.

John Bruton proving his understanding of Apple Tax is one step removed from Mary Mitchell O’Connor.

I always thought Fine Gael would roll out John Bruton for their Section 110 scandal, but perhaps based on his Apple Tax article, John’s better days are behind him and his mind is elsewhere.

IRISH INDEPENDENT: Any company could have secured the same kind of deal, John Bruton

Let’s go through the flaws in this (you will know yourself if you read the first two posts on this thread)

  1. “Any Company could have secured the same deal”. Almost comical statement, unless all of Corporate Ireland was simtaneously too stupid to copy this (and avoid all Irish taxes).

  2. “The Government never selected Apple for this subsidy”. Correct John, Apple demanded it.

  3. “The Irish Revenue act independently of Government”. Does any Irish person believe this?

  4. “[Revenue] They hold themselves to a high standard of objectivity and integrity”. Decades of tribunals (with no prosecutions) right up to the recent Section 110 scandal (where Revenue have been shown to be fiddling with their own anti-avoidance laws to help vultures), means this has as much credibility as 2. above. If in doubt, ask this guy.

Michael Lowry (ex. Fine Gael, and John Bruton loyalist, still not prosecuted)

  1. “The Commission Ruling … creates uncertainty for other Companies”. Only the dodgy ones John. Microsoft and IBM are next.

  2. “May encourage companies to incorporate outside the EU”. Have a good read of the EU TP System manual John. There is a reason why the Apple tax scam doesn’t work from the Cayman Islands etc. The EU have more belief in themselves than Ireland, and do insist that MNCs who want to sell into their valuable markets, follow the rules (just like in the US). Only Ireland believes that every foreigner (MNC and Vulture), should be 100% tax free. That is why Ireland had the GDP per capita of a 1st world country, but the public services of a 2nd world country. A system you helped design John.

  3. “The Commission decision … attempts to change the way profits can be distributed … for taxation purposes”. No John, Apple changed the way its profits are distributed by using a dodgy IP scam in Ireland (to trap profits away from EU and US) and a dodgy Revenue ruling (which gave them “offshore” status while still legally in Ireland).

  4. “Previously Companies could get authoritive guidance from National Tax authorities”. They still can John, but if the Company and Tax Authority are colluding to abuse the international tax system, then they will still be open to prosecution by the EU.

The rest of the article is “faux concern” for the EU Commission who John fears will be weighed down with Companies checking other private rulings (only the legitimate ones I suspect), and deflected from the real issues. However, I can’t imagine that there are more important objectives for the EU Commission then challenging the biggest tax avoidance scheme in modern economic history.

Michael O’Leary trying to outdo Mary Mitchell O’Connor for Apple Tax Stupidity

After John Bruton above, they seem to be lining up to out do Mary Mitchell O’Connor for stupidity re Apple Tax.
(MMO’C discussed here

IRISH INDEPENDENT: Michael O’Leary, Ireland should just threaten to leave the EU over Apple Tax … 48171.html

Just when I thought nobody could outdo the stupidity of Mary Mitchell O’Connor’s article (“if they were only here for the low taxes, they could have gone to the Cayman”), O’Leary proves that he is certainly not an expert on everything.

People who have read the first two posts on this thread will understand the stupidity of Michael’s article.

More “Leprauchan Economics” lessons for you Michael…’Leary%20Leprechaun%20.jpg

Discussion continues of who voted for the EU what and why etc etc. here - viewtopic.php?f=4&t=66388

Japanese Revenue show how “amateur” Apple’s Irish IP scam is (and why it is going to speed up Ireland getting the €19bn).

As discussed at length at in the first post of this report, one of Margrethe Vesgater’s “grenades” (and there are several), is showing other EU Revenues that Apple was, according to the Irish Revenue, remitting cash to a “stateless” entity that sits outside the EU TP System with no EU tax treaty. As I showed, this could cost Apple over €60bn (not €19bn), and is why Apple are going to beg us to take the €19bn

(“we messed up, Apple Ireland was always a fully “onshore” Irish resident company”, future statement from Tim C(r)ook).

Interesting article in Irish Times re Japanese Revenue, who have discovered that Apple Japan “forgot” to pay Withholding Tax on their “transfer” to Ireland (any readers of my Section 110 Vulture Fund scandal thread, will understand how critical avoiding Irish Withholding Tax is to Vultures). I forgot Withholding Tax re Apple’s tax scam. It is another nail in Apple’s coffin, as given Apple Ireland was “stateless” (according to our Revenue), it was therefore outside the EU Withholding Tax net (ouch !). This almost guarantees that Apple would incur full EU local taxes in each country, UNLESS it can prove that the Irish Revenue was wrong (ouch !), and Apple Ireland (“ASI”) was really fully Irish resident, all along.

Get ready for our €19bn Christmas present, I don’t think Apple is going to be waiting 6 years for it’s EU appeal to settle it !!

IRISH TIMES: Apple fined in Japan for under-reporting earnings sent to Ireland

Back at you Michael O’Leary

After O’Leary showing that his understanding of Apple Tax is about as good as Mary Mitchell O’Connor’s driving …

Michael O’Leary trying to outdo Mary Mitchell O’Connor for Apple Tax Stupidity

We now have the EU (humorously) turning the table back on us …

IRISH TIMES: German MEP and satirist demands Ireland’s ejection from EU on Apple tax

Which (finally) gets a response from Leo Varadkar …

IRISH TIMES: Michael O’Leary’s Apple remarks ‘like throwing a grenade’

… who himself, is no stranger to the Dublin IFSC “tax haven” circuit.

Turlough Galvin, Head of Tax Group in Dublin Law Firm, Matheson (2nd largest in Dublin)

The US plots revenge on the EU… … SKCN11L2VQ

Suzanne Kelly puts on the Green Jersey for Apple’s global tax avoidance scheme

IRISH INDEPENDENT: Why Ireland is only entitled to a Seller’s Margin on Apple Sales

While Suzanne Kelly is a barrister with a deep knowledge of Irish tax law, she makes a fool out of herself here:

  1. She forgot to mention Apple’s enormous and elaborate IP scam (which caused “Leprechaun Economics”), made Apple Ireland (“ASI”) far more then just a “seller” of Apple products; it is the owner of the non-US rights for most Apple products.

  2. She also forgot to mention (she knows this), that Apple made transfers from EU countries to a Company in a “stateless” location (that other EU countries have no tax treaty or transfer pricing arrangement with). This is going to hurt Apple.

Of course, common sensed readers of this thread, will realise that the insight of a “leading US tax academic”, is likely to be a little less biased, then the insight of a person who earns her crust from defending (and issuing private “opinions” for up to €250k a pop), MNCs in Ireland, trying to avoid all EU and US (and Irish) taxes, with dodgy “IP” TP schemes.

The fact that Apple did their “Leprechaun Economics” moment (see first post on this thread), itself proves that Apple themselves know they are wrong, and are trying to limit their liability to other EU Revenues.

Perhaps Suzanne is hoping to represent Apple. However, if she read this thread, she will realise that Apple are going to settle anyway in the next year or so, and pay the €19bn to Ireland.

Time to wheel out Upton Sinclair for the umpteenth time:

“It is difficult to get a man (or woman) to understand something, when their salary depends upon not understanding it!”


“Whose bread I eat, his song I sing” (Old German Proverb)

Dennis O’Brien filling up a bit of airtime for Bloomberg with little of note but does think Apple followed all the rules and Revenue is independent and all that. … brien-says

BTW, Ireland the best place in Europe to invest too - give that man the full green outfit.

Imagine if Apple started selling €30,000 cars(they’re working on it) and uses Ireland to do their transfer pricing. Ireland could be the biggest contributor to the E.U. budget of all the member states when the GDP takes off in to the stratosphere.

Does Denis have the same “stateless” arrangement as Apple did, with the Irish Revenue?
(and which the Irish Government was never aware of, of course …)

The have that DOB story up and as usual when it come to the Libelous one, comments are closed/not being allowed up. It’s over 1 hour since the story was posted and no comments as yet!
Free media!

No, he even threatened Waterford Whispers in his day, the cunt. :smiley:

Perhaps not. Apple in takeover talks with carmaker McLaren