BLOOD - Taking Down Humanity - Self spreading Vaccines or Vaccine Shedding: A Bio-weapon by another name?




White Blood

The white blood is poisoned - As I previously posted as to how breastfeeding is part of the complex and smart intergenerational immune system, being something Pharma can not compete with. Now see it poison the White Blood of the nursing mother to kill the babe, as a consequence of this insane global experiment.


More posts added to the page:










2yrs+ Permanent lockdown - NO EXIT


Spike proteins can cross the blood brain barrier and shed.


Drugmaker Pfizer expects to collect $15 billion in 2021 from sales of its mRNA experimental COVID vaccine. There is an irrepressible economic incentive among pharmaceutical companies for childhood COVID vaccines, boosters, and the like. Public health experts should stop and assess data on possible vaccine side effects and related post-vaccination questions before it is too late. Here are some major categories of concern as-yet publicly unaddressed by either the FDA or CDC. AFLDS believes these patient concerns ought to be taken more seriously by health regulators in the United States and abroad. Failing to consider these and other “known unknowns” is a dereliction of basic medical research.

1. Why is there concern surrounding this particular vaccine?

The COVID-19 vaccines are still experimental. They are currently being used on an “emergency” basis and are not FDA approved. It takes years to be sure something new is safe. The vaccines are new as is the technology they employ. This new biotechnology introduces something called a “spike protein” instead of the traditional attenuated antigen response in a conventional vaccine. No one knows definitively the long-term health implications for the body and brain, especially among the young, related to this spike protein. In addition, if documented problems with the protein do arise, there will never be any way to reverse the adverse effects in those already vaccinated.

2. What about the reported neurological issues?

There are two major neurological concerns related to the COVID vaccines. These are the spike proteins and the lipid nanoparticles which carry the mRNA into the cell. They are both capable of passing through the “blood-brain barrier” which typically keeps the brain and spinal cord completely insulated from entrants into the body. There simply has not been enough time to know what brain problems and how often a brain problem will develop from that. There is concern amongst many scientists for prion disease (neurodegenerative brain disease).

Traditional vaccines do not pass through the blood-brain barrier. Crossing the blood-brain barrier places patients at risk of chronic inflammation and thrombosis (clotting) in the neurological system, contributing to tremors, chronic lethargy, stroke, Bell’s Palsy and ALS-type symptoms. The lipid nanoparticles can potentially fuse with brain cells, resulting in delayed neuro-degenerative disease. And the mRNA-induced spike protein can bind to brain tissue 10 to 20 times stronger than the spike proteins that are (naturally) part of the original virus.

3. Can the unvaccinated get sick from contact with the vaccinated?

The vaccine produces many trillions of particles of spike proteins in the recipient. Patients who are vaccinated can shed some of these (spike protein) particles to close contacts. The particles have the ability to create inflammation and disease in these contacts. In other words, the spike proteins are pathogenic (“disease causing”) just like the full virus. What is most worrisome is that a person’s body is being suddenly flooded with 13 trillion of these particles and the spike proteins bind more tightly than the fully intact virus. Because of the biomimicry (similarity) on the spike, shedding appears to be causing wide variety of autoimmune disease (where the body attacks its own tissue) in some persons. Worldwide cases of pericarditis, shingles, pneumonia, blood clots in the extremities and brain, Bell’s Palsy, vaginal bleeding and miscarriages have been reported in persons who are near persons who have been vaccinated. In addition, we know the spike proteins can cross the blood brain barrier, unlike traditional vaccines.

4. What about interaction between unvaccinated children and vaccinated adults?

AFLDS is concerned that some children will become COVID symptomatic after their parents and teachers get vaccinated. This concern does not relate to risk from infection. Indeed, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Children’s Hospital Association, approximately “1.6% of children with a known case of COVID-19 have been hospitalized and 0.01% have died.” Rather, public health bureaucrats might use these cases of breakthrough transmission or symptoms to speculate that a child’s illness is related to a SARS-CoV-2 “variant,” when in reality it is a reaction to the vaccine. Our other concern is that children could develop long-term chronic autoimmune disease including neurological problems due to the fact that children have decades ahead of them and trillions of the spike proteins mentioned above.

5. Is there a post-vaccination menstrual bleeding risk?

AFLDS is aware of thousands of reports involving vaginal bleeding, post-menopausal vaginal bleeding, and miscarriages following COVID-19 vaccination as well as anecdotal reports of similar adverse events among those in close contact with the vaccinated. We cannot comment definitively on the close contacts yet, other than to say we have heard reports of this worldwide. But there is so much reporting of vaginal bleeding post-vaccination that it is clear a connection between the vaccine and irregular bleeding exists. Despite this clear-cut evidence, menstrual-cycle changes were not listed among the FDA’s common side effects in its phase-three clinical participants. Women’s reproductive health needs to be taken seriously rather than waved away by agenda-driven public health officials.


The continued rollout of COVID-19 vaccines moves along without due consideration of patient side effects and post-inoculation complications. AFLDS calls on state and federal health regulators to release more adverse-event-related data and conduct additional follow-up studies before the FDA fully licenses any of the vaccines currently administered under emergency use authorization. The growing body of evidence is too compelling to ignore.

EDIT for exact src link:


HUMANICIDE: Pfizer admits in its own mRNA jab trial documentation that non-jabbed people can be ENVIRONMENTALLY EXPOSED to the jab’s spike proteins by INHALATION or SKIN CONTACT.

Appears to be another copy of the original PDF document that was like previously here

8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure

Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. Exposure During Pregnancy

• A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

Page 67

A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy). Exposure During Breastfeeding

An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:

  • A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.

A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

Refrain from unprotected sex for 28 days n'stuff - Vaccine trials document

My God, so the ‘vaccine’ is contagious. This all has an element of the Walking Dead about it.


Hopefully just the protein is shedding, not the mRNA.

Also, well I was about to say would they be that stupid as to make a contagious vaccine with an entirely new and previously unused technology that could have unforeseen consequences, but on reflection :grimacing:


Now I am not a huge fan of the whole prion as a pathogen business, after the CJK / Mad Cow Disease fiasco, but there is lots of evidence that mRNA vaccines triggers a big increase in prion density in some recipients.

But the really fun read is this book…

So it seem back in 2017 they did not know how mRNA vaccines really worked. Did not know how mRNA vaccines crossed the cell barrier. Except in a few very specific situations in lab experiments. Had no real idea of the long term trajectory of mRNA vaccines in the human body. And had not the slightest idea of long tern effects, positive or negative.

There is a survey paper from mid 2019 that indicated that there was not much improvement in understandings in the following two years but there had been several really spectacular clinical trial failures causing the candidates to be withdrawn from the approval process.

So not exactly guaranteed to fill one with confidence.


Summarised Instagram pages in the links below, with tons more anecdotes of the uninjected being around the injected, but still experiencing various types of adverse events

Sourced from:

Join the campaign as we call on the public to play a crucial role in the COVID-19 vaccine trials - The Control Group. Shortly after receiving Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), Pfizer and Moderna chose to unblind their placebo participants by offering them the vaccine, citing ethical concerns. In doing so, they have obstructed the vaccine development process and diminished the potential to conduct long term studies to determine true long term safety and efficacy.

“In a scientific study, a control group is used to establish a cause-and-effect relationship by isolating the effect of an independent variable. Researchers change the independent variable in the treatment group and keep it constant in the control group. Then they compare the results of these groups.”

Without a true control group, vaccine makers do not have the data to draw meaningful conclusions about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines long term. As members of the public and believers in science, we are becoming the control group in order to ensure proper vaccine development and it’s true safety and efficacy.


Well, we all have high hopes, anyone who can make better head or tail of this than link below than I, please, please do, please have a read of this - maybe in indicates or not, that the group which did not get the vaccine also demonstrated similar level of mRNA in their bronchoalveolar fluid or is it the virus mRNA and not a injected mRNA?

Archived link:

Looking for more info but this is all I have right now.


Well coronavirus is a single-stranded RNA virus, that’s why it’s so mutable. These viruses replicate by taking over the organelles in the cytoplasm of the host cell to make new copies.

Looking at this site, I think covid is a positive stranded RNA virus, and so:

In these viruses, the virion (genomic) RNA is the same sense as mRNA and so functions as mRNA. This mRNA can be translated immediately upon infection of the host cell

So, the viral genome acts as mRNA.



Our friends at John Hopkins once more:

Self-Spreading Vaccines: Self- spreading vaccines are genetically engineered to move through populations like communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection. The vision is that a small number of individuals in a target population could be vaccinated, and the vaccine strain would then circulate in the population much like a pathogenic virus, resulting in rapid, widespread immunity.

Search the doc for the term “self-spreading” for more info.

Link (PDF) -

Your numbers up! Do you plan to get the FREE experimental genetic injection from the HSE & Big Phamra?

If this thing is self-spreading using some transmission mechanism unstated and unknown to the public, the people, the world at large, then the informed consent model has been blown up and that leaves perhaps only two explanations: A) incredibly well organised incompetence or, B) WAR through deception, where B relies on A for mass effect.


Doctors talking about what is causing the transmission from the genetically injected to the uninjected population. Something interesting points and it’s not going to be a pleasant listen but the more than listen the better the outcome.


Incredibly enough this concept was reported on last year, not sure it got much attention but suddenly everyone is finding these articles and similar from September 2020.


Utopia 2020

“What did you put in the vaccine…”


It’s been a while since I quoted this 12 years ago on the pin but Cusacks character is delivering the same rationalisation and message:

The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” – Club of Rome The First Global Revolution



Are Debunkers Dangerous to your health?

The Global Debunking Task Force Network previously know as the main stream media, has been marshalled into action in the fight against insurgent infodemic and radical online anecdotal fundamentalists:

Nice all the same of the the journal to confirm shedding is a real thing with vaccines (cause a lot of peopel don’t two that is a thing) for the ordinary reader to comprehend, maybe they read @Diana posts.

However evidence to support the headline “debunked” is not presented in the article (which from the few debunking sorties is often the case, remember the headline bias trick), so more like bunk by omission.

To my way of reading it it leaves out key aspects of how the mRNA might work and what might occur in terms of immune system interactions ( per concerned microbiologists the world over) and also side stepping the reality that the trials will not be complete until 2023, IIRC all that correctly and this thing only has emergency marketing authorisation not full approval as the article tries to imply (something that could take up to 15 years depending).

There is also a notable absence of the disseminating or self-spreading vaccines as already outlined here. So the idea is not wrong conceptually and has some probability, but then you wowouldudl have to assume what is in the vial is does not do exactly what it says on the tin.

What this tell you this is a targeted hit on a breakout surge of information, by way of online anecdotes that threatens the narrative and magical magic of the big-parma moment.

More examples:

Further, a potential these infodemic hunters never get to (cause they’re part of it) is that this has the potential to be another phase in the very well crafted, timed and released psy-op, to create further division among a very bewildered and terrified world, to makes the crazy look even crazier in the eyes of the covidian true believers happy to get shot up, all the while it still could be true, yes a thing probably too insane for most to believe, thus leveraging incredulity as a perfect cover to slip in the trojan genetic shot into as many arms as possible before they are noticed and it is all too late.

Cult… No no, you’re the Cult!

Covidian cult of #unbelievewomeners, calls women anti-vaxx cultists

“This is a new low, from the delusional wing of the anti-vaxx cult,” said Zubin Damania, MD, a.k.a. ZDoggMD, in a video he recently posted to bust vaccine shedding myths.

Is the most realistic MSM headline yet?

The key phrase is “so far,” and the authors do a good job of balancing the lack of data with the very real possibility that a connection could exist. The fact that we don’t currently have data doesn’t mean the connection isn’t there—it just means that researchers haven’t yet studied it sufficiently. So in this particular topic, as in any other, articles proclaiming that there’s “no evidence” or “no proof” that one variable might affect another should be careful to explain that nuance. They often don’t.

What we do have so far is a lot of anecdotal evidence on the connection—women who report that they’ve experienced irregular timing and flow of their periods after vaccination—and a small amount of actual data on Covid-19 and menstrual changes.

On the first front, a researcher at the University of Illinois mentioned her own experience on Twitter and asked if others had also had menstrual changes after vaccination—the response was robust, and she and her colleague at Washington University in St. Louis have now turned it into a formal survey. Hopefully clinical research looking into the connection will soon follow.

Thing is, this forbes piece is only dealing with those who have received the experimental injections. Yes, these anecdotes appeared much earlier so first, but then came the side-effects-by-proximity anecdotes to knock it out of the park. Perhaps a case of 2+2 = 5? Well, unless it is also studied, we can only assume yes practice is to #believewomen right? :woman_shrugging:

In summary - Leading cult experts believe debunker fact-checkers debunking those checking unknown facts, could lead to wrong choices and negative outcomes that would directly effect the bottom line of Covidian cult coffers, due to general well being and prolonged life.


A Doc in the US won’t see injected patients… what would the HSE do?. :thinking: