Not sure where you are coming from with that comment.
The debt levels are unsustainable, so itās a question of who pays. Saying āstealingā citizenās money doesnāt get you very farā¦the government debt is the citizenās debt. The problem, as I see it, is that the trick of using negative real interest rates (of 2 to 3% pa) is not working out because inflation is too low, so the debt must be dealth with directly. The warning signs have been building ever since what happened in Cyprus.
Surely this was a likely scenario all alongā¦did people really expect Germans to dip their hands into their own pockets to bail out what they view as profligate statesā¦
The stateās debt is legally the responsibility of the state. There is no legal requirement to steal from citizens. It would be treasonous if a dying state performed a widespread theft of the citizens as its last act.
The key difference is that the bank guarantee (spit) was done to keep the state alive, under the premise of benefiting the common good. If the state declares bankruptcy then it makes no sense whatsoever to steal from the citizens.