I think you need to do your research. And learns some basic maths and clinical process.
Screening is not injected the subject with experimental vaccines. Not one single person of the tens of millions screened in these various programs can be shown to have died as a result of the screening process over the last few decades.
So far there have been several tens of thousand of adverse effect mortalities from the SARs vaccines,.
See the difference?
One provably saves lives without harming anyone. The other might save a few lives while killing and maiming tens of thousands.
Those numbers in the paper are actually very good considering the paper was written 20 years ago and based on trial programs. The full national programs instituted since then have screened tens of million of women and saved tens of thousands of lives.
The actual number of lives that will be “saved” by this low efficacy short acting SARs 2 vaccine, people of very low risk of viral pneumonia (low PSI/PORT), no comorbities etc, will be unlikely to break the 5 figure in the next 12 to 18 months. For US, EU and UK.
The vaccine will not reduce the mortality rates of those with high PSI/PORT scores. They will just die at the same rate of other causes of viral pneumonia. And unlike all other previous pandemics of the last 130 years younger people with low PSI/PORT just dont die very much from SARs CoV 2. But they die at a much higher rate from the vaccine than they do from SARs.
So the vaccine will kill far more people that it might plausibly “save” in the next 12 to 18 months. Far more.
And far more people will die in the next 5 to 10 years from preventable cancers due to all screening and most treatments being stopped since the start of the COVIDIAN Panic than could ever be possibly be lockdowns.
Thats the science. Thats the mathematics.