Coronavirus 2020

coronavirus

#7086

I seen someone mention that there are 4 ministers for health at the top table now.

Martin, Varadkar, Harris, Donnelly. That covers 10 of the last 20 years.


#7087

Source?


#7088

Which bit of the media is a full scale permanent propaganda asset of pure unadulterated evil is no one understanding?

… but hang on while I pretend ot be shocked for a moment:

OMG! OMG! OMG! HANG ON! OMG is that story not already 24/48 hours old? :woozy_face::woozy_face::woozy_face::woozy_face:


#7089

Awwww it’s the jet plane analogy turn in the game… didn’t we have fun with that before! I’m off to have a look…

RTE - “It’s like someone moved RTE studios to Funderlands Haunted House”

In the latest moves due to the injection ADE Adverse Reactions super-holocaust. The national broadcaster has suffered deep staff and funding shortages, one former head of programming now rolling on the floor believed they would not stop until they had a “Skeleton staff”, running the entire broadcast operation.


#7090

Pfizer Cabinet


#7091

The Trend is the Enemy

The health care system came under under unseaonsal pressure during the summer.

The trend is into it’s 5th month, about to go into it’s 6th month.

The official “data are clear”.


#7092

No fucks given about the permanent 100% daily fatal plane crash that is the injection regime of crashing planes, a “no huge issues with safety” according to Christine Loscher, whom popped onto the scene back in July looking to stick needles in children and pump them full of synthetic mRNA and DNA, which destroys their young hearts leading to death.


#7093

#7094

Not far off the result in the original and greatest pin poll in the stellar Booster Beware thread, that clicked an incredible 12 voters so far, we had so many more options, we didn’t just presume you were already double hit - Pin polls, only the best polls.


#7095

Boost what now?:wink:


#7096

Well he didn’t have the booster - was only partially vaxxed with 2 doses…

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1462897293699526671

image


#7097

Alternatively…


#7098

I believe it’s normally 20 days.


#7099

Seen elsewhere… I’ve no link or confirmation though. But SIV was a contaminant in old polio vaccine batches etc.

This was reported recently.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/10/31/100-percent-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-caused-by-just-5-percent-of-the-batches-produced/


#7100

Brilliant.
Sure, these were meant to be the conspiracy theories.
Who’s making decision which number is to be used?
If this is true the number of knowing participants will be well over a million mark in Europe alone.

Edit. It’s old:



#7101

And another one… Ceann Comhairle has caught it…
https://twitter.com/micheallehane/status/1462787675048579084


#7102

Love all the comments about getting retested until it’s negative!
Sympathetic comments are few and far between.


#7103

A key piece of the puzzle. Tomas Pueyo

The “science” had always been on the side of not locking down. This was a formidable problem for the early advocates of mass containment, and it is where Neil Ferguson and his Imperial College pandemic modelling team proved useful. They threw together a modelling study claiming that millions would die if Hubei-style lockdowns weren’t imposed, and Johnson’s government folded. In Germany, medical bureaucrats decided they wanted a lockdown too, but like many countries, we found ourselves in the awkward position of not having a native tradition of pandemic modelling to produce the made-to-order scientistic justifications. Nevertheless, our Interior Ministry threw together a team of medical bureaucrats and mid-level scientists to produce an anonymous pseudoscientific “strategy paper” that could be used behind the scenes to persuade politicians and journalists that lockdowns were the only way.

They had the name from “Coronavirus: The Hammer and the Dance”, a viral essay penned by Bay-Area thinkfluencer Tomas Pueyo and posted to Medium on 19 March. Within just days, this piece came to the attention of bureaucrats and politicians in multiple countries, ultimately guiding lockdown policies across the West.

Pueyo had just come to prominence nine days earlier, with another widely shared Medium essay entitled “Coronavirus: Why We Must Act Now.” This item merely rehashed the reasoning of the WHO report endorsing lockdowns in more simplified terms that a broad public would readily understand. “The Hammer and the Dance” was, in turn, a popularisation and mild adjustment of the Imperial College study. Models are country-specific, for they depend on the healthcare and economic resources available in their respective jurisdictions. Pueyo’s role was not only to simplify, but also to withdraw the Imperial College model from the context of the United Kingdom and transform it into a general political appeal that would speak to medical bureaucrats everywhere.

It’s unsurprising, looking back at Pueyo’s work today, to see that he was completely wrong about almost everything that matters. What is perhaps more bizarre, is the extent to which his zombie theses continue to dictate containment and also vaccination policy almost everywhere, despite their near-total falsification.
Take, for example, his belief that infection waves will continue to rise, either until they have infected every last susceptible person on earth, or until your government orders the virus to stop:

This is obviously untrue. Infections rise and fall according to overwhelmingly obvious seasonal and regional patterns. These effects are far more significant than any government policy, from lockdowns to universal vaccination, could ever hope to be. What is more, we are not all in contact with each other, and we live in overlapping social circles. When the virus finds a pocket of interconnected, susceptible people, a wave gathers strength, but soon the virus starts stepping on itself, as it bumps into more and more people who are already sick. Then the wave collapses and the virus is reduced to low levels of infection until it can find another seam of interconnected, susceptible people. This is how all viruses work, and it is why we have the ICU and hospital capacities that we do – because scenarios where every last person is infected over the course of a single month literally never happen, they are impossible


#7104

More about Patient Zero for the Totalitarianism infection - Tomas Pueyo

https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/ihuman/covid-19-blog/what-does-covid-19-mean-expertise-case-tomas-pueyo

https://archive.md/6qpI2


#7105

Here is the mathematics of a Casedemic. Why most tests are false positives so the more test you do the more “cases” you have.

This is the key graph

prevalence_graph

The prevalence of SARs Cov 2 has been around the 0.3% in the general population since end of Q2 2020. So the PCR test results on hospital patients from Jan 2020 to Jun 2020 are mostly valid. Almost all PCR test’s done since then are invalid. Due to low prevalence of test candidates.

All quotes you see claiming much higher prevalence are “model estimates” based on test results and as such have no validity. Just another junk model.

This is a more detailed graph

from here

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8694889_Basic_Problems_of_Serological_Laboratory_Diagnosis

This shows just how dependent the PPV is on the specificity of the PCR test. The thing to remember here is that the quoted specificity for the FDA approved reagents is calculated using a method where the field test specificity is not going to be close to the quoted number. Its not going to be around 99%. Its going to be closer to 90%. Based on the quality of the swabs, lab procedures and cross contamination etc.

The same goes for the EU approved PCR reagents as all the current PCR reagent specificity is an estimate based purely on a performance comparison with a reference reagent. Whose specificity was calculated using the FDA method.

The key take from this is that even the test subject the all the (non specific) symptoms of a SARs CoV2 infection serious enough to seem medical attention the actual probable prevalence for SARs CoV 2 in the general population subject is less than 10%. Lost of other infections have the same symptoms. So with a false negative for the PCR test of > 50% that means that the false positive rate is still around 75%…

And you thought it was just doctors writing that was terrible.Their grasp of maths it seems is even worse that their writing.