Yes of course I do. Two things can be true at the same time.
- Jared etc lost him the election and should not have been hired.
- Biden is a dangerous, dementia suffering swamp creature and should not be President.
Yes of course I do. Two things can be true at the same time.
Dan Scavino speech to the RNC
President Trump on Wednesday fully pardoned his former national security adviser Michael Flynn, bringing to end a tumultuous four-year criminal case that felled the three-star general before prosecutors reversed course and declared they had improperly pursued his prosecution.
Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general, had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about talking with a Russian diplomat during the 2016 Trump administration transition period.
Attorney General William Barr earlier this year asked a federal court in Washington, D.C., to allow the Justice Department to drop the case. However, the matter has since been tied up in legal proceedings.
Trump informed the general and his lawyer Sidney Powell of the decision Wednesday afternoon, ahead of the Thanksgiving Day. Flynn was elated by the news and the two men talked “like they had never missed a day since the campaign or early White House days,” an eyewitness told Just the News.
Suppose no gag order now either.
What “the Resistance” really fears more than anything is General Michael Flynn’s mouth. He’s been under a judicial gag order since his case went before Judge Emmet Sullivan’s federal district court. Understandably, Gen. Flynn wasn’t eager to complicate his unjust plight with a contempt citation. Judge Sullivan’s recent shenanigans have one object: to keep that gag order in force as long as possible. The moment Judge Sullivan confirms the DOJ’s move to dismiss the charges, as he is duty-bound to do, General Flynn will be free to offer his views to the public. That might be inconvenient in an election season.
I’m sure he has a lot to say. Gen. Flynn was head of the Defense Intelligence Agency for two years (2012 – 2014) under Barack Obama, and he knows a ton about every crooked operation Mr. Obama presided over, including the Benghazi fiasco, the Ukraine regime change op, and especially Mr. Obama’s hijacking of the NSA supercomputer surveillance database known as “the Hammer,” which was set up originally to track terrorists and then used by DNI James Clapper and CIA chief John Brennan to spy on Americans, most particularly Mr. Obama’s political adversaries. It’s rumored that Mr. Obama took the database with him when he left the White House, and it is said to contain great gouts of usefully damning information about just about everyone in government, including senators, congressmen, and Supreme Court justices.
Gen. Flynn became an antagonist to Obama & Co. when he objected to the nuclear deal they were cooking up with Iran and when he spoke out against the CIA’s 2013 Timber Sycamore op to arm and give money to Isis terrorists opposing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Mr. Obama canned Gen. Flynn in 2014. What really sealed Gen. Flynn’s fate was when he started publicly complaining about the politicization of John Brennan’s CIA. The New York Times quoted him saying, “They’ve lost sight of who they actually work for. They work for the American people. They don’t work for the president of the United States. Frankly, it’s become a very political organization.”
And a few months later, he jumped on Donald Trump’s campaign bandwagon. When he led the cheer “Lock her up” at the Republican convention, you can imagine how that gave the heebie-jeebies to a whole lot of other Deep State denizens besides She-Whose-Turn-Was-Foiled. And then, Lord have mercy, he was appointed to sit at Mr. Trump’s very elbow in the West Wing as National Security Advisor! Well, you can imagine the tremors that provoked. Gen. Flynn had declared his intention to completely reorganize, partially dismantle, and audit the intel community monster that had spread like a slime mold through the government. Mr. Brennan especially feared the audit part of the deal, since his agency regarded the billions of dollars that flowed in and out of it as just another one of its sacred secrets. Flynn had to be stopped…
The new Pentagon head has brought with him more changes.
If I understand this correctly, this moves Special Operations into civilian/military control out of CIA hands.
A flavour of some of the video comments:
Basically this is what JFK was trying to do , the. Then CIA took him out .
As I said in a reply to another comment, The last President to stand up to the corrupt CIA was JFK and he lost his life for it. Trump is the bravest man I’ve ever seen, and I pray with all my heart he is successful. CIA/Corrupt Higher-Up Democrats 100% rigged this election. I would imagine CCP being involved in some way as well. Thank you, Mr. President, for trying to save our country from this darkness.
No more hiding in the shadows and Abusing S.A.D. operators with out oversight from Actual J.S.O.C. with civilian based individuals to avoid secretive methods and we can avoid operations like Las Vegas and unfortunately back with JFK they did not have the same patriots as they do today.
Idk man, I don’t know if I can trust these people after U.S.S. Liberty
Trump, keeps his promise to his friend JFK Jr to destroy the CIA
The directive, which the Pentagon’s White House liaison Joshua Whitehouse sent on Wednesday afternoon, removes 11 high-profile advisors from the Defense Policy Board, including former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright; retired Adm. Gary Roughead, who served as chief of naval operations; and a onetime ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman. Rudy De Leon, a former chief operating officer at the Pentagon once considered by then-Defense Secretary James Mattis for a high-level policy role, will also be ousted.
At least Tramp didn’t start a war, while all other US presidents did. Trump only bombed Syrian army a few times and assassinated Iranian president-in-waiting Soleimani, so we can call him a killer or murderer, but not a war criminal, as all other US presidents, who are responsible for war crimes in multiple countries.
Jesus. It would be nice to think that might just be to put the shits up the right people.
There are really a small number of interpretations of what motivation might be behind this.
I am amazed no one has posted this all these years.
It surely cant be ignored and allowed to stand. If it is and I can see a lot of violence for a long, long time. Not good.
It seems a showdown is imminent.
It’s quite clear the democrats are capable of investigations with a predetermined outcome. They are almost certainly going to target Trump after January 20th. If he permits it.
So now what? Trump is going to use some of those crazy emergency powers he’s had for the last year? Seems obvious.
The timescale is becoming cramped. Whatever it is, the Endgame is almost here. Interesting times between here and January 21st.
A lot going on in that 45 min address, first the focus here is the specific mention of Durham, either Barr really is swamp creator as many believe and the Durham move was a protection move and this was Trump calling it out, or it was a exercise in placing distance between himself and Durham for what might come out in any investigations. reducing perceived conflict of interest.
Interestingly, Barr has a string of weird claimed and possible connections hanging about him, which also stand apart form being AG in the GHB administration.
Mostly Trump supporters tend to be weary due to the following:
Barr’s Father - Barr’s father is possibly responsible for hiring Jeffery Epstein when headmaster at the school in which Epstein was hired to teach, but other claims allege his father had already left the school before Epstein was hired.
Ruby Ridge - here is the story of Barr’s involvement in the controversial Ruby Ridge event via his defence of the FBI sniper who “slayed” a mother and child, a story that does not sit well with many Americans, but another curveball that popped up in recent years implicates a lot of names if true:
In that context, the recent move by AG Barr to appoint Durham as a special counsel is steeply intriguing for it’s timing and implications.
Trumps targeted and contextual mention of Durham in his 45 min address, brings back into focus the most recent and last Q drop #4952 (nov 13th) containing only the word “Durham”, is either significant of something, or absolutely nothing. It becomes more significant when you read through historical references to Durham thought the drops.
Many believe Durham was a investigator working away for a long time in the background undetected by the media while other more visible investigations were underway.
Based on these previous drops and current suspicious, there is the view mentioned this is a protective or defensive move by appointing Durham as a special counsel is the classic method in covering up evidence of serious crimes during a potential second Trump term or Biden first term, similar to what many believed the Mueller expedite was really all about, covering up cover ups under the guide of an investigation.
You may have already seen the 2018 EO posted here 22 days ago at time of this post.
DECODING PRESIDENT TRUMP’S DEC. 2ND SPEECH
Consider what Trump said in yesterday’s speech. You can watch the full speech here, but if you don’t know what to listen for, you’ll miss all the important language. About 95% of this speech was filler. Only 5% really matters, as I detail below:
First, he lays out that he has a sworn oath to defend the United States Constitution against the wartime “siege” that’s under way:
As President I have no higher duty than to defend the laws and the constitution of the United States. That is why I am determined to protect our election system, which is now under coordinated assault and siege.
He then explains that the vote was criminally rigged with “fraud” (which is a crime) and that it’s now time to overturn the election results and correct them:
Millions of votes were cast illegally in the swing states alone, and if that’s the case, the results of the individual swing states must be overturned, and overturned immediately.
Then he explains that China was part of this entire plan from the very beginning, via their engineering and launching of the coronavirus, which Democrats used to justify mass mail-in ballots which were used to steal the election. This statement specifically invoked national security elements of our defense protocols:
The Democrats has this election rigged right from the beginning. They used the pandemic as an excuse to mail out tens of millions of ballots, which led to a big part of the fraud… and there is no one happier than China.
Trump then calls for a “full forensic audit,” which can obviously only take place under military authority, since the local elections officials are corrupt, fraudulent criminals. He explains this himself:
Dramatically eroding the integrity of our elections was the Democrats’ number one priority. For a simple reason: They wanted to steal the 2020 presidential election. All of the Democrat efforts to expand mail-in balloting laid the groundwork for the systematic and pervasive fraud that occurred in this election.
Then, about 30 minutes into the speech, he invokes legal language that clearly references Trump’s Sep. 12, 2018 executive order which describes remedies for foreign interference in U.S. elections. Here’s what Trump says:
The only conceivable reason why you would block commonsense measures to verify legal eligibility for voting, is you are trying to encourage, enable, solicit or carry out fraud . It is important for Americans to understand that these destructive changes to our election laws were NOT a necessary response to the pandemic. The pandemic simply gave the Democrats an excuse to do what they were trying to do with many many years.
Note carefully the phrase, “…trying to encourage, enable, solicit or carry out fraud.”
Where have we heard something very similar before? In the 2018 EO, which describes who will be subjected to having all their assets seized by the United States government — and note that this applies to corporations, individuals, partnerships and even non-profits: (emphasis added)
Sec. 2. a (ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for , or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i)
Sec. 2. a (i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;
Thus, Trump just invoked the 2018 EO and sent an undeniable signal to Chris Miller at the DoD (as well as many other groups) that the Democrats, the treasonous media and the complicit Big Tech giants have all engaged in concealing, advocating or supporting “foreign interference” in the U.S. election.
TREASON, RENDITION FLIGHTS AND MILITARY TRIBUNALS
What is the remedy for such actions of treason against the United States?
Under existing U.S. law, it’s a felony crime to try to rig votes. Under military law during a time of war, it’s treason. And under the 2018 EO, each of the entities engaging in this behavior will have all their assets seized by the U.S. Treasury .
Translated into plain language, this means that Twitter, Facebook, CNN, the Washington Post, Google, MSNBC, etc., are all now able to be completely seized, shut down or taken over by the Trump administration, as they all engaged in the defined behaviors outlined in the 2018 EO, which Trump just cited.
Consider that as I list all the evidence that Trump’s attorneys and DoD “white hat” team members now possess, much of which will surely be presented to SCOTUS, most likely by Sidney Powell, once one of her cases reaches that level of the judicial system:
- CIA director Gina Haspel admitting to election interference in a full confession which has now been acquired. (This is covered in the Dec. 3rd Situation Update podcast, above.)
- Dominion executives confessing to engineering backdoors into the systems, which has also been acquired.
- Packet analysis results from “white hats” who intercepted all the real-time vote rigging traffic, which includes the specific instructions from CIA servers to add the hundreds of thousands of votes in real time to Dominion tabulation machines in swing states. This is now publicly confirmed by Col. Phil Waldron.
- Log files and software evidence from the seized CIA servers in Frankfurt, which provides physical and intellectual proof that the CIA inserted hundreds of thousands of votes into the Dominion tabulation machines.
All this evidence exists right now. Trump has it all. His speech lays the official groundwork that can now be cited by other officials (namely, in the DoD and Treasury, which runs the US Secret Service), in order to justify their own initiation of orders for further arrests, rendition flights and wartime activities necessary to defend the United States of America against foreign enemies who are waging cyber warfare against the United States.
10 USC 394: AUTHORITIES CONCERNING MILITARY CYBER OPERATIONS
In case you’re wondering whether the U.S. military under Trump really has the authorization to respond to acts of cyber warfare with coordinated conventional military actions, read 10 USC, Section 394. Subtitle A, Part 1, Chapter 19, which is available via uscode.house.gov:
(I’m bolding the especially important sections):
§394. Authorities concerning military cyber operations
(a) In General.-The Secretary of Defense shall develop, prepare, and coordinate; make ready all armed forces for purposes of; and, when appropriately authorized to do so, conduct, military cyber activities or operations in cyberspace, including clandestine military activities or operations in cyberspace, to defend the United States and its allies, including in response to malicious cyber activity carried out against the United States or a United States person by a foreign power.
(b) Affirmation of Authority.- Congress affirms that the activities or operations referred to in subsection (a), when appropriately authorized, include the conduct of military activities or operations in cyberspace short of hostilities (as such term is used in the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93–148; 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.)) or in areas in which hostilities are not occurring, including for the purpose of preparation of the environment, information operations, force protection, and deterrence of hostilities, or counterterrorism operations involving the Armed Forces of the United States.
© Clandestine Activities or Operations.- A clandestine military activity or operation in cyberspace shall be considered a traditional military activity for the purposes of section 503(e)(2) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3093(e)(2)).
f) Definitions.-In this section:
(1) The term “clandestine military activity or operation in cyberspace” means a military activity or military operation carried out in cyberspace , or associated preparatory actions, authorized by the President or the Secretary that-
(A) is marked by, held in, or conducted with secrecy, where the intent is that the activity or operation will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly ; and
(B) is to be carried out-
(i) as part of a military operation plan approved by the President or the Secretary in anticipation of hostilities or as directed by the President or the Secretary;
(ii) to deter, safeguard, or defend against attacks or malicious cyber activities against the United States or Department of Defense information, networks, systems, installations, facilities, or other assets ; or
(iii) in support of information related capabilities.
TRUMP ANNOUNCED “OFFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS” JUST ONE WEEK AFTER SIGNING HIS SEP 12, 2018 EXECUTIVE ORDER
As you ponder all the implications of that, note carefully that just 8 days after President Trump signed his September 12, 2018 executive order, the Trump administration announced the launch of “offensive cyber operations” against foreign enemies. This was reported by the Washington Post, which explained, “The strategy incorporates a new classified presidential directive that replaced one from the Obama administration… It allows the military and other agencies to undertake cyber operations intended to protect their systems and the nation’s critical networks.”
What would be considered “offensive cyber operations?” Kraken , of course. The 305th military intelligence battalion.
Of course, just 8 days earlier, President Trump had designated elections infrastructure as “critical infrastructure.” So now the pieces fit. The circle is complete. The election theft was cyber warfare against critical U.S. infrastructure. This authorizes all kinds of national security activities, such as using U.S. Army Special Forces units to raid the CIA server farm in Frankfurt, which took place shortly after the election.
Also in 2018, President Trump had authorized the National Security Presidential Memoranda (NSPM) #13, covering “offensive cyber operations.” Here’s a list of all the NSPMs, but notably, “offensive cyber operations” is a secret and is not publicly shown.
In fact, the Trump administration fought to keep this document hidden from Congress, given that in 2018, the House was run by Pelosi and other treasonous actors who had just pulled off the 2018 cyber attack on the U.S. elections infrastructure, stealing dozens of House seats in order to “win” a majority in the House, from which Adam Schiff could launch his impeachment scheme to try to remove Trump from power.
Trump was able to prevent the House from reading NSPM #13 for 17 months, according to Fifth Domain, which reported:
“On a bipartisan basis some of us sent a letter to the Trump administration demanding that they share with, at least some of the leadership on the Armed Services Committees, the rules of engagement for certain cyber contingencies,” Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, said at the time. “The Obama folks did give us that information, the Trump people changed it, but then they were reluctant to show us.”
What we now know is that Trump was planning the 2020 election sting / cyber warfare “trap” in 2018 , and that these cyber warfare response protocols were intentionally kept from Congress for as long as possible while plans were put in place to catch the Democrats stealing the next election (the 2020 election).
Full text here:
Coming back to this July 30th post.
A case in screenshots in no particular order.
Pence: I knew Flynn lied to me about Russian contacts when he was fired The vice president vouched for Flynn during a January 15 appearance on Face the Nation before the former national security adviser was terminatedhttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/pence-i-knew-flynn-lied-to-me-about-russian-contacts-when-he-was-fired/
Dr. Dave Janda’s interview w/Lt. Gen Tom McInerney 5.31.2020
Leo had no qualms receiving and meeting Pence and his wife in Farmleigh (Phoenix Park), in a similar fashion to how he had no qualms meeting Obama in secret (Logan Act ?!) before meeting Trump for the first time - compare and contrast to the coverage and drama surrounding Trump as a visiting President of the United States to Ireland.
It all makes for an interesting picture.
Wow. Just wow. Stellar work .
The White House removed nine members of the Pentagon’s Defense Business Board on Friday and installed people loyal to President Donald Trump in their place, including presidential allies Corey Lewandowski and David Bossie.
The firings marked the latest effort by the Trump administration to clean out the Defense Department in the final weeks of the president’s term.
Members of the board received a brief email from Joshua Whitehouse, the White House liaison to the Department of Defense, that simply said, “if you are receiving this e-mail, your membership on the Defense Business Board has expired or is coming to an end.”
“A number of board members have been terminated with a form letter. In my experience, I was very surprised that the White House would, at the eleventh hour, adjust an advisory board that for 19 years has had a record of nonpartisan support with the department,” Michael Bayer, who until today was board chair, told POLITICO.