Tens of trillions in bogus worthless derivatives, trillions more on stock and house prices, corporate earnings stuck in a lower gear for a very long time after the popping of the Blingundtat Bubble, a vast overhang of debt lowering consumer spending for a decade or two and truly stupendous amounts of pointless capital malinvestment.
D’ye really think a few billion in dodgy currency can overcome the tidal wave of destruction?
The Debtmonkey System is broken and it ain’t coming back in our lifetimes.
They could add a zero to our bank notes, but I don’t think that’s the issue.
I see this as a people v banks.
The evidence so far demonstrated by the politicians seems to show that government represents the banks and not the people. I’ve always thought democracy was a sham, but I wasn’t sure on who were the real masters. Now we know.
I mean taking advice from Sean Fitzpatrick to take money form the schools and pensioners shows you who is in charge of Ireland.
I believe the banks will still own the politicians who will screw the people until either a. the debt becomes manageable or (more likely) b. the people cannot pay for the banks any more as you can’t get blood from a stone. Society starts to break down and everybody rich or poor (who still have their capital in the country) loses. Only then will the government start to resemble a democracy and real solutions will be found.
Inflation is untenable for the banks, unless they can charge more interest than the inflation. If inflation is 20%, then those interest rates would be horrific for the banks to make money. Somebody is going to pay for this.
I keep reading opinions like this on here, that inflation is about to destroy savings.
This may not be the case at the moment, as CBs are struggling to stave off deflation according to some. The big question is when does inflation kick in, and in what asset class?
As this is (some might argue nominally at this stage) a website about the Irish property collapse, are those predicting spiking inflation also predicating an increase in the price of houses as a result??
But isnt that the whole point that increases in wages erode the burden of debt. Of course, our wages are too high in real terms so those increases may lag inflation.
I posted the artice as I think medium term inflation is a real possibility. Unlike a lot of people here I have debt and have given a lot of thought to Taleb’s attitude to risk and variable interest rates with income uncertainty are one of my two huge financial risk. It is easy to take the recent decreases to ease off on my current thrift, but have decided to keep the payments the same by fixing the debt.
I agree, that’s what increases in wages would do as part of a general inflation; I just don’t see how, with global wage arbitrage depressing wages, that is to be achieved short of:
Capital controls/import controls/job export controls (more protectionism)
Tariffs (eh, protectionism)
I also don’t see how it is possible to have higher inflation without higher interest rates, as you point out above. The risk to debtors therefore doesn’t decrease with high inflation, in fact it increases in the short-term as higher interest rates will demand a payment premium before incomes ‘catch-up’, as you also point out.
Further, I still think it unlikely that the Bundesbank-dominated ECB will allow for high inflation to erode savings. It is a constitutional requirement in Germany that money be sound. The Bundesbank managed to get through the 1970s without severe inflation, despite what the rest of the world was doing. Could it be different this time?
There is a danger in counting in round numbers. Economic cycles don’t seem to recognise them…
For instance, while workers 1920-1930 earned more by the end of the decade than at the beginning, between about 1925 and 1935 wages fell (IIRC the dates), with a significant amount of that in the late 1920s. This was identified at the time as one of the proximate causes of the depression - the increase in debt relative to wages and the reduction in spending power.
But what seems clear is that spending power has reduced relative to credit outstanding, that this has been going on for a long time, and that deflation in the price of consumer goods, high employment rates and low interest rates have masked this.
I’ve been rambling on about this for years, the 1970s Counter-Revolution and the concerted effort ever since to convince the masses to abandon all the gains in wages, welfare and conditions made by the common man since the end of WWI. This is actually what Reagan and Thatcher (and the PDs) were really all about.
Tis right back to the 18th century the bankers and their pet politicians want to take all of us.
Real wages have been stagnant at best pretty much everywhere in the industrialised world for 20 years, the populace in general is maxed out on debt, the demographics are poor, the amount of “wealth” destruction going on dwarfs any printing the central banks can possibly do, and there is a vast amount of misallocated slack capital that was poured into houses, factories and shopping centres during the bling bubble.
For all those reasons I’ve been firmly in the “deflation everywhere” camp for months. I just can’t see how any attempt to engineer an inflation can possibly succeed.
But without protectionism, european and US labour will be priced out by cheaper labour elsewhere. You can see why it is such a popular cheap trick in a depression. The only way to control price would be to set a floor using import tariffs - is there anything that is made in Europe that isn’t made elsewhere?