Do you think that there shouldn’t be consequences for reckless lending?
Are you suggesting that there was reckless lending in this case or are you making the argument that banks shouldnt be allowed repossess anything as they engaged in reckless lending in the past?
Do you think that people who owe millions should have their debts assumed by the taxpayer while those who owe less (ie those who are deemed non-systemic) are pursued for theirs?
No, i believe that everyone who has debts that they cant pay should have the assets that secure those debts seized and if they then need to be bankrupted so be it
Do you think teams of ex British soldiers (or possibly paramilitaries) should be engaged to batter elderly Irish people whilst turfing them into the street a few days before Christmas? On behalf of the same ‘systemic’ class who benefited from bailouts or NAMAnisation?
What has christmas got to do with anything, if it was 1 june would that make a difference? they were supposed to have been out in september. What elderly people were battered?
Do you think Gardai have a responsibility to ensure that Irish citizens are not assaulted by thugs in broad daylight regardless of their financial circumstances?
*The gardai have a responsibility to uphold the law of the land, regardless of the nationality of those involved, in what i can see from this it was the irish citizens breaking more laws than the alleged british ones.
Do you think Ireland is a country or a corporation?
I dont understand the point you are trying to make