It’s astonishing that the most obvious answer is not on the table.
More people get to keep their jobs
Society benefits by having more gardai on duty - with knock-on benefits to the economy in terms of lowered crime, reduction in costs of doing business etc
I know of a couple private-sector businesses where the wage bill needed to be cut (by more than 6.7%). Management presented the figures to staff and gave them the option - X number of redundancies (with a specified package), or everyone takes a Y% pay cut. In both cases I heard of, the employees chose the pay cut.
This idea that if a ps worker retires you’ve somehow met some idiotic and meaningless target is stupid. You are simply increasing another part of the ps wage bill, ie the pensions in payment - I don’t think government is very joined up here
The career break idea is at least somewhat innovative by government standards but again real savings look a bit dubious if you’re giving someone 30 k to feck off for a few years
The taxpayer cut the Garda wages budget.
So who decided to take his particular option - senior management, minister for justice, some cost benefit anaysis report??
I keep wondering when will we reach the point where the gardaí and others on the government payroll start to see this
I mean they live in the same country, they and their family get sick and will have to go to a hospital with less nurses or they will be sending thier children to schools with less teachers
how long will it take before they see that pay cuts as bad as they are, might be the best for everyone
Again the front line workers are wheeled out as the pawn, while the kings and queens sit back sheltered.
Cue the public who are then meant to jump up and down and feel threathened at the prospect of fewer policemen/nurses/doctors/firemen etc etc. An appalling vista, make it stop, make it go away. Here we’ve signed the cheque for you.
Paying guards to sit at home or sit on a beach is absolutely shocking. Who came up with this idea anyway? The commissioner needs to be a leader. If he is not up to it let him move on.
No one is going to “lose” their jobs. The reduction in head count will be done by early retirement, voluntary redundency, paid sabbatical or natural attrition. So there’s no incentive for anyone to agree a pay cut because nobody will be out of a job if they don’t want to be. It is not an either/or scenario.
Nothing new about this. The HSE did it about three years ago – three year breaks on 1/3 salary. In fact, those people should be back knocking on the door looking for their jobs back just about now.
Totally agree, something in the region of 300k+ civil/public servants, yet apparently we can’t even afford to pay 13,000 gardai. Probably less than 100k real frontline workers, this is complete bollocks, how many quangos has fg/lab gotten rid of ?
The problem in this country is the state meddling in way too many aera’s using taxpayers money, many really management pet projects and politican/family employment schemes, provide essential services and leave us alone after that…