I don’t particularly like or even properly understand the new format of this site but one of the interesting features is the way in which it draws your attention to old threads. I’m not sure whether that’s a good thing or a bad.
However, in the case of this one it’s pretty interesting to read back through the comments in light of the ‘no collusion with Russia’ Mueller determination.
It seem that those most invested in a story that would appear to have been little more than a massive conspiracy theory are the loudest in labelling others as conspiracy nuts, alt-right looms and even in a couples of instances paid Russian trolls.
It’s pretty unbelievable to read these comments from people who presumably perceived themselves to be highly sensible in their consumption of source material and in their output.
I arrived at a similar juncture a number of years back when i determined that many of my former left leaning views were actually horsehit. Assuming there is nothing beyond the already published summary contained in the Muelelr Report, can we expect similar Pauline reappraisals to commence sometime soon I wonder ?
In other words the definition of ‘swivel eyed loons’, ‘retards’ , ‘bots’ etc etc appears to be very much subjective