Ivermectin

treatment
coronavirus

#1

Ivermectin being studied for COVID 19 || COVID Medication Update Today

Ivermectin and COVID 19

Ivermectin Works For COVID-19 - LATEST STUDIES


#2

#3

60 minutes of video, reply 1m post OP - which speed setting did you use on youtube… warp speed? :open_mouth:


#4

I was looking this up recently.

If you had searched your own site you would have found this.


#5

Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, Part II

Yes, it’s getting a lot of attention again recently.


#6

This is interesting though.

And gives dosage recommendations.

https://osf.io/wx3zn/?fbclid=IwAR1D8zI_SzOtaFAOG840QYFfdtvjcNxtd38-ej-hG_uj_RBIbkKYwCHnUbQ


#7

#8

Ivermectin is Now a Therapeutic Option for Doctors & Prescribers!

Jan 14, 2021 – One week after Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory – founding members of the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) – along with Dr. Andrew Hill, researcher and consultant to the World Health Organization (WHO), presented their data before the NIH Treatment Guidelines Panel, the NIH has upgraded their recommen­da­tion and now considers Ivermectin an option for use in COVID-19.

Their recommendation has now been upgraded to the same level as those for widely used monoclonal antibodies & convalescent plasma, which is a “neither for nor against” recommen­da­tion. The significance of this change is that the NIH has decided to no longer recommend against the use of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19 by the nation’s health care providers. A consequence of this change is that ivermectin has now been made a clear therapeutic option for patients.

https://covid19criticalcare.com


#9

This new designation upgraded the status of ivermectin from “against” to “neither for nor against”, which is the same recommendation given to monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma, both widely used across the nation.

By no longer recommending against ivermectin use, doctors should feel more open in prescribing ivermectin as another therapeutic option for the treatment of COVID-19. This may clear its path towards FDA emergency use approval.

Full text here: https://www.newswise.com/coronavirus/nih-revises-treatment-guidelines-for-ivermectin-for-the-treatment-of-covid-19


#10

The regime has held the island population hostage for a year pumping them with “until there is a vaccine” hopium and pre-conditioning msm output at levels never before seen in human history, to receive uncritically an experimental injection deceptively called a “vaccine”, which doctors know is already killed many vulnerable people - thus what is often a greater measure of the imposition of such pathological behaviour is the lack really of any and all other approaches as a matter of persistent dogma.

Think about what the regime goons and media have been doing since…

April last Year

An anti-parasitic drug available throughout the world has been found to kill COVID-19 in the lab within 48 hours.

A Monash University-led study has shown a single dose of the drug Ivermectin could stop the SARS-CoV-2 virus growing in cell culture.

“We found that even a single dose could essentially remove all viral RNA (effectively removed all genetic material of the virus) by 48 hours and that even at 24 hours there was a really significant reduction in it,” Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute’s Dr Kylie Wagstaff said on Friday.


Archived link: https://archive.is/f599v


#11

There are more and more trials supporting the use of Ivermectin:

Plus it’s been around for decades and has a good (and well documented) safety profile


#12

Rhinovirus can block, treat, and cure Covid-19.

That is of course, the common cold.


#13

If it turns out that the use of Ivermectin in Africa, in prophylasixs as an anti-parasitic (and possibly anti-viral) goes some way to explain the much lower prevalence and effect of the Attack Of The Virus, and doctors have been calling for it’s use since last year with some using it to great effect, then that really puts a giant big hole in the current postures and direct efforts to inject every living soul with mRNA, especially when it may not be on the table as an option for a patient.

Ivermectin and Covid-19 in Africa

Although Africa reported its millionth official COVID-19 case last week, it seems to have weathered the pandemic relatively well so far, with fewer than one confirmed case for every thousand people and just 23,000 deaths so far. Yet several antibody surveys suggest far more Africans have been infected with the coronavirus—a discrepancy that is puzzling scientists around the continent. “We do not have an answer,” says immunologist Sophie Uyoga at the Kenya Medical Research Institute–Wellcome Trust Research Programme.

Could it be because over 300 million people take Ivermectin every year – mostly in Africa?

According to Mary Elizabeth May, RN, BA, MPH, “Ivermectin’s greatest impact on human health has been in Africa. Since 1987, in addition to its use for other parasitic infestations, ivermectin has been used extensively to control onchocerciasis with 1.4 billion treatments so far. Onchocerciasis is also called “river blindness” because the blackfly that transmits the disease breeds in fast-moving streams and rivers. … Over 300 million people take ivermectin each year. To date, ivermectin has been shown to be a safe and well-tolerated drug. Most adverse reactions are mild and temporary, such as loss of appetite, headache, muscle aches, lack of energy, and fever. There have been a small number of severe adverse events and even some deaths in humans treated with ivermectin in onchocerciasis-control programs. The reason for these events is unknown, but they might be linked to the presence of large numbers of other parasites that are killed off in treated patients.”

Imagine, if this one cheap drug currently used to treat family pets, sheep and hundreds of millions of Africans, was being denied to western populations, well that would be a bit awkward right?

Some think it’s criminal, because many suspect their respective governments have done some incredibly dodgy deals with banks and pharma companies so that they coercively push you into become a test subject in a mass injection experiment of unproven and unknown outcomes. Now clearly that kind of thinking is not only illegal, as it is like a “conspiracy theory” so we know people are utter fools who go down that road, and no government in the world would ever even agree to anything so diabolically untoward (because NAZIS) such as secret deals behind closed doors and the backs of there own people, surely it would not only cause undue suffering, cost lives but undermine the very stability of their own societies and rule of law, imposing such a self-imposed burden that their respective nations may teeter at the precipice.


#14

Unfortunately the WHO didn’t approve it this week. The FLCCC will keep at it - their website, and Dr Tess Lawrie’s, have a lot of data / studies about it.

But it’s political, and the FLCCC realise that I think (btw do donate if you can!).

The vaccines are EUA / CMA only. I think they lose their emergency/conditional licenses if either (1) the pandemic emergency ends or (2) an alternative treatment is available.