Added in some cumulative columns. Also put in a computed totals line, which differs from his totals by a couple of units, possibly due to unshown fractions.
It bears out the stats that the top 5% of earners pay over 40% of all tax, and the top 10% pay over 55% of it. Amazingly, the bottom 60% pay barely 5% of all tax, and the bottom 70% just over 10%… ultra-progressive!
If one added in payments from the state (e.g. from SILC) one would see that it is only the top 20% of earners that are net contributors. 80% are net beneficiaries… the welfare state, yep, that’s here…
I tried something like this before and tried adding graphs for other countries to compare how progressive various countries were. I gave up after when the task escalated and I struggled to find out details on tax regimes overseas. Anyone on here working abroad able to dig out similar stats for where they are?
It’s somewhat complex for France, as everyone who’s employed seems to be paying at least 21% in social charges. Income tax is paid on your net, i.e. after deductions. I’ll try to dig out some statistics this week.
I dunno what the IT story is getting at, but the current rates are, I think:
4% PRSI
7% USC
An extra 3% PRSI on income over 50k (or some other arbitrary amount…).
There is a 10% USC rate for income over 100k but only if you are self employed. I dont think they even tried to justify the self employed clause. In my opinion it was but there as they are the least organised resistance group.
When you include VAT, excise and other taxes, the poor pay a lot of taxes too.
The most important conclusion to draw from these figures, is that the overall tax burden on everyone, rich and poor is far too high. That reduces the incentives to produce and consume. Theres a strong incentive for everyone to just sit at home and surf the internet, and to not produce anything and to not buy anything.
To make the economy boom, we need to LOWER income tax on both rich and poor alike. That can easily be paid for by cutting state spending on public sector wages and pensions. There is no need for the state to be taxing and spending €30bn a year. Most of it is just wasted.
It could be argued that public servants and public representatives are in some ways similar to the self-employed group. Unless I’m mistaken the only PRSI payment made is the employee one. How about we ask Minister Burton to pay a 17% PRSI rate herself?
Should the government be making an employer contribution? I think possibly they should. It’s a more honest way of funding PRSI once you’ve government employees looking to draw down from the fund - and often earlier than normal workers.
A self-employed person would like to get the state pension based on around a 4% contribution, as does your average TD– except the TDs will look for it as part of their pension which they’ll be drawing down before the age of 67.
It’s funny but I thought socialisim was were the burden was shared for the common good.
To me it looks like the burden of funding the state is grossly shifted on to higher earners. All I hear from the media is that higher earners need to pay more when the above graph suggests that approximately 20% of earners are suporting 80% of the rest and the 80% want more without even recognising the support they already get.
Ireland is also the only state where socialists oppose a property tax and don’t care about a VAT increase.
It’s not socialism in Ireland, I think it would be more accurate to call it Entitleism or Fecklessism.
White goods and adult clothes are two that come to mind. You might say the former aren’t actually essential, but life without a cooker and a fridge is pretty unpleasant.
I’ve bought in my adult lifetime precisely two washing machines, two fridges, two freezers and two cookers; oh and two microwave. Of these half were second-hand… they don’t really wear out.