From the IMF, 14th July 2010:
[
Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. In the context of the 2010 Article IV consultation with Ireland, the following documents have been released
](https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2010/cr10209.pdf )
However, the path from crisis to stability and recovery is a narrow one. With some reversal in the earlier loss of competitiveness and improvements in the global economy, exports will lead the recovery. … Moreover, the unwinding of home-grown imbalances from the boom years—arising from rapid credit growth, inflated property prices, and high wage and price levels—will create deflationary tendencies that act as a drag on growth. Banks remain a source of downside risks from higher than expected losses, uncertainties in global regulatory trends, and continued financial market tensions that restrict access to funding.
Blue Horseshoe
RTE news mentioned that the IMF also advised Nama to get on with selling properties to “normalise the market”. I presume this was part of the same report. Could this be the start of the major firesales?
I was speaking to one of the big liquidation specialists a few weeks ago, the chap said they believe that NAMA will start to release LARGE volumes of apartments/houses in Q1 or Q2 next year. I asked would this not collapse whatever remains of the market and he effectively said probably but what will be will be
For me, the key bit of the homeowner “bailout” recommedation is this bit:
The increasing economic stress will require targeted support for homeowners.
With increasing arrears and reschedulings, the Financial Regulator has cautioned that
homeowner distress may be the “biggest legacy” of the crisis. The Regulator has required
banks to wait 12 months from when arrears arise to initiate repossession on a primary
residence if the borrower is engaged in restructuring arrangements. Government programs
also assist with interest payments for mortgages originated in recent years and interest
supplement to the neediest. The authorities noted that further support measures raise the risk
of moral hazard, and, hence, of strategic default, and create a perception of unfairness. A
working group on Mortgage Arrears and Personal Debt Review is studying available options.
Mindful of these considerations, staff proposed that, with persisting unemployment,
additional support measures may be needed for a narrowly-targeted group of vulnerable
homeowners to limit the economic and social fallout of the crisis. With their capital bolstered
by the state, banks could absorb the initial costs, perhaps basing themselves on the welfare
system to identify eligible beneficiaries.
This process will be aided by an overdue shift to a more efficient and balanced
personal insolvency regime . The authorities noted that discussions were ongoing regarding
inclusion in the law of an optional out-of-court resolution mechanism, and whether this may
apply to small businesses as well as individuals. This would allow a more timely and
flexible, as well as less costly alternative to the current legal framework. Staff pointed out
that a repayment period of three to five years and the removal of overly punitive elements
such as imprisonment for nonpayment of civil debts would bring the regime more in line
with European practices.
I believe this is the consensus on the 'pin (such as it is) that the insolvency regime is onerous, but that with reform it is the appropriate mechanism for over-extended borrowers. An equitable assessment of liabilities and needs has to take place. I’m not sure whether I am oddly comforted or beetle-browed suspicious that the IMF agrees…