After mucho squealing from Castlerock the Times tries to straddle the grand canyon and fails. Informing a debate me hole.

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/educatio ... -1.1361045

NOTE quotes are resynched by 2Pack. They do not appear as sequenced by the Times but they appear.


Ehhh, the taxpayer pays for the teachers but carry on.



PWC lost more than one bank on their watch. What PWC did was load the VEC sector and the Voluntary secondary sector together here. This is FALSE Accounting...but we offically had banks then I think thanks to PwC

They loaded all the VEC Bertie era schemes including Youthreach (costs a fortune) PLCs ( cost a fortune) and deprivation supplements like DEIS (only urban VEC schools nowadats since Quinn abolished rural deprivation) and also the still extant language and traveller support systems in VEC schools into the spreadsheet.

Then they added the VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOLS who do not (_generally_) run Youthreach (costs a fortune) PLCs ( cost a fortune) and deprivation supplements like DEIS (only urban VEC schools nowadats since Quinn abolished rural deprivation) and also the still extant language and traveller support systems into the same spreadheet.

Then they AVERAGED these costs across schools that receive none of these special scheme incomes. And by averageing they destroyed the VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOL system since austerity arrived into town.

The PROBLEM is that the VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOLS are the education system. Most of ....like.....everybody with a brain who is relied upon to run anything in Ireland went to a VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOL along with a small rump wo went to Private Schools and are/were not bankers or work for PwC.

Middle Ireland exists because of the VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOL sector. It was nuns and brothers in my day but they
are long gone out of it. Sadly Ruari Quinn has spnt his entire career hollowing out the VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOLS to the extent that 50% of them ( including most schools that were attended by Irish Times journalists ) will close by the end of this decade the way Quinn is runnig things.



The TUI would. They do not have members in the VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOL sector, only in VECs. But a lot of the support payments that they have have been cut back since PwC published their report. It would be unwise to assume the Bertie era spending delivered anything useful but the cash kept TUI members busy. They don't cost as much as that though. Back to the Times.



And the cost of the VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOL sector is the lowest of all. It comes in at slightly above Fee Paying ...less than €1000 per skulll and at half that of the (frankly) shite PwC number but in reality at 2/3 of the like for like PwC number. and a hell of a lot better value. It is just taht Daddy and Mummy dont pay €5000 a year per chile from the pocket on top of that ( for a day pupil)

And the schools caught in the middle are where the average literate numerate Pin member learnt to read and write and express themselves hereabouts. You can forget about your own offsprings though. tech or privaye for them. Most of them will be shut by 2020 and it is the fault of the near doddrering Mr Quinn and his innumerate staff in his departmemt.

And with them goes our last hope for a better future. The VEC sector produces very little product of any merit.

Thanks a lot to PwC for deliberately misframing the debate too but that is OK seeing as the portners generally went to a VOLUNTARY SECONDARY SCHOOL while their spoilt chilters went to Castlerock so they could scream at plebs in cafés off Dame St. The Times bleats on about them for many column inches thereafter.

I'll keep it simple......how may Pinsters attended their local Tech?????

We have a thread about this somewhere. But this nonsense report deserves its own thread.

I liked this comment



That JMB crowd are insufferable.

It is commonplace for parents to send their more academic offspring to the local secondary school and the less academic child to the local Tech.

We'll send little Johnny to the Tech - they have a marvellous programme there for students with dyslexia!/ They're very good at dealing with students who hated primary school/They've a lovely atmosphere there and little Johnny would thrive better there than in the local secondary where the atmosphere isn't as "nice".

Meanwhile, Patrick is sent to the local secondary school where he wastes too much time on religious indoctrination.

If the local secondary school dispensed with the religious indoctrination, they might do a lot better than they actually do. The Techs do very well indeed considering the cohort they generally get. In fact, if Mummy and Daddy sent their academic kids to the Tech, they'd probably do better there than in the local secondary, as less time would be wasted there in religious indoctrination.

Most of the league tables are dominated by the local secondary schools despite that. Mummy and Daddy will be sending their sprogs to the tech whether they want to or not and within 10 years anyway....unless they can afford the fees for a small number of private schools.

Quinn will get what he wants, in fact he will get all he wants. The religous will be gone out of education shortly along with Quinn himself when he retires. But he is fighting a 1970s and 1980s battle at the wrong time here. Shame the actual education will be gone out of it as well and that he will crash the bits that work best to get his way.

Apart from the academic results secondary schools also cost a hell of a lot less than VEC schools ( even after the mendacious lying rubbish from PwC is stripped out) and on a strict like for like basis but including the extra VEC backroom staff, our new religious orders.

[quote="doubleglaze"][quote="2Pack"]

And with them goes our last hope for a better future. The VEC sector produces very little product of any merit.

I'll keep it simple......how may Pinsters attended their local Tech?????[/quote]

It is commonplace for parents to send their more academic offspring to the local secondary school and the less academic child to the local Tech.

[i]We'll send little Johnny to the Tech - they have a marvellous programme there for students with dyslexia!/ They're very good at dealing with students who hated primary school/They've a lovely atmosphere there and little Johnny would thrive better there than in the local secondary where the atmosphere isn't as "nice".[/i]

Meanwhile, Patrick is sent to the local secondary school where he wastes too much time on religious indoctrination.

If the local secondary school dispensed with the religious indoctrination, they might do a lot better than they actually do. The Techs do very well indeed considering the cohort they generally get. In fact, if Mummy and Daddy sent their academic kids to the Tech, they'd probably do better there than in the local secondary, as less time would be wasted there in religious indoctrination.[/quote]
Hold up!
I went to my local Tech ..... and got a great education which set me up for my current career.

+ 100%

The VEC sector is full of UNRECOGNISED AND UNACKNOWLEDGED dysfunctionality and inefficiency. CEOs of VECs are accountable to ......NOBODY!

HOw many Pinsters will send their children to a VEC school? (Although Maynooth and Castleknock VEC schools have a good reputation)

I think that's doubleglaze's point in the last sentence. Her point is about parents rather than schools.

Lots of snide "mummy and daddy sending little Johnny" commentary in this thread which doesn't help.

I've repeated ad nauseum on this site that the vast majority of people I know sending their kids to private schools are ordinary people. Good people, not given to doses of moral superiority. Not "spoilt childers" or any of your other lazy stereotypes.

It's very interesting that the PWC figure turns out to be bogus. Feel free to have a good ideological circle-jerk over that fact.

2Pack, you seem to have a lot of anger about this issue. You may well have a great point but I can't tell -- TBH your post is poorly referenced and very ranty. You're jumping to a lot of conclusions and taking swipes at people for no good reason.

I think it would inform the debate if you could clarify some stuff. Again, I'm not arguing with your point, just trying to understand it and your sources.



They pay for *some* of the teachers. Private schools use funds to add more, no?


[citation needed. Also be nice.]


[citation needed]

[citation needed]


[citation needed]


[citation needed]


[citation needed]