Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: National Broadband Plan will cost the taxpayer over €2bn
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:53 pm 
Offline
IMF'd

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 31854
Location: Tullamore
tulip wrote:
Is it really reasonable to expect to cover every depression and radio shadow and put a fibre down every road even though someone built a gaff down there knowing full well that there was no decent broadband.

Yes, you said that already. If you can put a phone line down there, you can string fibre. the process is no different, apart from a node splitter, no extra equipment is required. To provide anything else, you need to get fibre to the cabinet (whether that's mobile or FTTC, fibre has to get to it), so we're really only talking about the last few miles.

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."

So long and thanks for all the fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: National Broadband Plan will cost the taxpayer over €2bn
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 9:33 am 
Offline
IMF'd

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 31854
Location: Tullamore
Here's an interesting aside on the limitations of Satellite broadband and possibly on Musk's actual target audience...
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/12/1 ... n_network/
Quote:
The tribunal also said that, from the evidence it heard, the EAN satellite’s “maximum capacity is 42.1Mbits/s or 19 Gbytes/hr and the ground cells’ aggregate capacity was 34,268 Mbits/s or 15,421Gbytes/hr.”

It added, after hearing figures from experts: “What we can say is that those figures demonstrate that the satellite by itself can service no more (and probably less) than 2 aircraft on the high load scenario, and something like 20 aircraft on the low load scenario.” The high load scenario was expressed as 50 per cent of passengers aboard an airliner “streaming, browsing and using social media”. The low load scenario's details were redacted from the judgment because it revealed commercially sensitive information.

Given the design intent of the EAN, the airliners under discussion are likely to be Boeing 737 or Airbus A320-type airliners capable of carrying around 180 people at a time. No specifics were given in the judgment, though it noted that “there are on average 550 shorthaul planes flying above Europe at any one time”.

Nonetheless, only around eight per cent of European flights (“44 aircraft”), according to the evidence shown to the tribunal, are expected to need the satellite instead of the ground stations. The CAT said: “If only half of those were fitted with EAN then the low load scenario would be capable of being fulfilled in respect of practically all those planes,” while adding that these projections may not “necessarily reflect the real world operation of the system.”


Not so much the specifics of EAN, but how much capacity is expected to be required for satellite only broadband, e.g. in places that don't have ground stations (most of the world).

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."

So long and thanks for all the fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: National Broadband Plan will cost the taxpayer over €2bn
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:59 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 22, 2007
Posts: 1906
yoganmahew wrote:
tulip wrote:
Is it really reasonable to expect to cover every depression and radio shadow and put a fibre down every road even though someone built a gaff down there knowing full well that there was no decent broadband.

Yes, you said that already. If you can put a phone line down there, you can string fibre. the process is no different, apart from a node splitter, no extra equipment is required. To provide anything else, you need to get fibre to the cabinet (whether that's mobile or FTTC, fibre has to get to it), so we're really only talking about the last few miles.


True, I did repeat myself :oops:

I'm not an expert on landline installation but I was talking to an ex-Eir emloyee and he says hooking up a one off can be expensive if new poles have to be laid. Now most of that work is already done for most houses so they don't have that cost but for FTTC you still have to back haul all those cabinets and exchanges to handle the increased traffic which is a job of itself.

Fibre to the gaff to me is like rolling out the copper network again (without having to plant poles). If it was easy SIRO would've done it.

BTW it's not just rural areas that have gack broadband. I live inside the M50 and get between 2-5Mbps as my cabinet hasn't been hooked up to fibre even though all the surrounding ones have. Luckily SIRO is coming to my area so I'll be gigabitting it soon :D

_________________
No tool is omnicompetent. There is no such thing as a master-key that will unlock all doors.
--Arnold Toynbee

If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid.
--Epictetus


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: National Broadband Plan will cost the taxpayer over €2bn
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 7:22 pm 
Offline
IMF'd

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 31854
Location: Tullamore
tulip wrote:
BTW it's not just rural areas that have gack broadband. I live inside the M50 and get between 2-5Mbps as my cabinet hasn't been hooked up to fibre even though all the surrounding ones have. Luckily SIRO is coming to my area so I'll be gigabitting it soon :D

Absolutely - I lived in an apartment block in Dublin at one stage, and there was zero permission for private lines, but the copper in to the apartments was disastrous even for dial-up. Refitting them to have decent phone and fiber or cat6 is a large ugly job (since they're plastered into the walls). Many older houses have manky internal wiring too!

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."

So long and thanks for all the fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: National Broadband Plan will cost the taxpayer over €2bn
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:37 am 
Offline
IMF'd

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 31854
Location: Tullamore
It could be worse, though, we could be like the US and have a regulator that's in the telcos' pockets, with a definition of broadband that's heading back to 4/1...
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/12/1 ... _internet/

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."

So long and thanks for all the fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: National Broadband Plan will cost the taxpayer over €2bn
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:53 am 
Offline
Nationalised
User avatar

Joined: May 3, 2007
Posts: 12063
yoganmahew wrote:
It could be worse, though, we could be like the US and have a regulator that's in the telcos' pockets, with a definition of broadband that's heading back to 4/1...
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/12/1 ... _internet/


You have crappy ISPs in Ireland like Airspeed and Ripplecom and Imagine whose antics are just like those US Wireless Operators mentioned in the article. There are some very good Wireless ISPs in Ireland but the awful ones are truly shite. :(

_________________
SEO Ireland. SEO Dublin.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

Click for Latest Posts LATEST POSTS Click for Forum List FORUMS   

Follow, Retweet @dailypinster

  

Pyramid Built, Is Better Built!